高级检索

      “河湖长+检察长”协同治理的全国实践、制度类型与法治化路径研究

      National Practice, Institutional Typology, and Rule-of-Law Pathways of the “River/Lake Chief + Procurator” Collaborative Governance Mechanism

      • 摘要: 全面推行河湖长制以来,"河湖长+检察长"协同治理模式在全国各地大量涌现,成为破解水生态保护行政执法局限、推进依法治水的重要制度创新。本文以水利部2020—2024年连续五年编制的《全面推行河湖长制典型案例汇编》为核心文献,系统梳理广东湛江、河南全省、安徽蚌埠固镇县、上海奉贤区、重庆大足区、山东东营市、宁夏盐池县等典型案例,将现有实践归纳为三种制度模式:其一,"河湖长+检察长"双轨协同模式,以公益诉讼为核心工具,通过行政执法与司法监督的双轨并行实现低成本高威慑;其二,"河湖长+检察长+警长"三力联动模式,在行政与检察基础上叠加刑事侦查权,以刑事威慑切断"利益驱动型"违法的利益链条;其三,以水利+公检法为核心的"四长联动"综合治理模式,通过制度整合构建行政执法、检察监督、刑事追诉、司法审判的全链条闭环体系。三种模式在制度逻辑、启动门槛、适用场景和法治化程度上存在显著差异。本文进一步从公益诉讼制度与行政执法协同的法学视角,深入分析各模式的制度根源、运作机制与边界局限,系统审视"行政依赖""运动式执法""越权介入""地方差异"等深层风险,并就推动"河湖长+检察长"机制从地方经验走向全国制度、从规范性文件走向法律授权、从运动化实践走向常态化规程提出具体路径建议,以期为"十五五"时期深化河湖长制有名有实、有能有效提供理论支撑。

         

        Abstract: SINCE THE FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIVER AND LAKE CHIEF SYSTEM, THE "RIVER (LAKE) CHIEF + PROCURATOR-GENERAL" COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE MODEL HAS EMERGED WIDELY ACROSS CHINA, REPRESENTING A SIGNIFICANT INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION THAT OVERCOMES THE LIMITATIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT IN AQUATIC ECOLOGICAL PROTECTION AND ADVANCES WATER GOVERNANCE UNDER THE RULE OF LAW. DRAWING ON THE FIVE ANNUAL VOLUMES OF A COMPILATION OF TYPICAL CASES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIVER AND LAKE CHIEF SYSTEM (2020–2024) COMPILED BY THE MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES AS THE CORE SOURCE MATERIAL, THIS STUDY SYSTEMATICALLY EXAMINES REPRESENTATIVE CASES, INCLUDING ZHANJIANG (GUANGDONG PROVINCE), THE ENTIRE HENAN PROVINCE, GUZHEN COUNTY (ANHUI PROVINCE), FENGXIAN DISTRICT (SHANGHAI), DAZU DISTRICT (CHONGQING), DONGYING CITY (SHANDONG PROVINCE), AND YANCHI COUNTY (NINGXIA). BASED ON THIS ANALYSIS, THE EXISTING PRACTICES ARE SYNTHESIZED INTO THREE INSTITUTIONAL MODELS. THE FIRST IS THE DUAL-TRACK COLLABORATIVE MODEL ("RIVER (LAKE) CHIEF + PROCURATOR-GENERAL"), WHICH EMPLOYS PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AS ITS CORE INSTRUMENT, LEVERAGING THE PARALLEL OPERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT AND JUDICIAL SUPERVISION TO ACHIEVE LOW-COST, HIGH-DETERRENCE OUTCOMES. THE SECOND IS THE TRIPARTITE LINKAGE MODEL ("RIVER (LAKE) CHIEF + PROCURATOR-GENERAL + POLICE CHIEF"), WHICH ADDS CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION POWERS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROSECUTORIAL FRAMEWORK, USING CRIMINAL DETERRENCE TO SEVER THE PROFIT CHAINS UNDERLYING "INTEREST-DRIVEN" VIOLATIONS. THE THIRD IS THE COMPREHENSIVE GOVERNANCE MODEL FEATURING "FOUR-CHIEF LINKAGE" (WATER RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION + PUBLIC SECURITY + PROCURATORATE + COURT), WHICH BUILDS A FULL-CHAIN CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEM INTEGRATING ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT, PROSECUTORIAL SUPERVISION, CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, AND JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRATION. THESE THREE MODELS EXHIBIT SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES IN INSTITUTIONAL LOGIC, ACTIVATION THRESHOLDS, APPLICABLE SCENARIOS, AND DEGREES OF LEGAL FORMALIZATION. FROM THE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE OF SYNERGY BETWEEN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT, THIS STUDY FURTHER EXAMINES THE INSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS, OPERATIONAL MECHANISMS, AND BOUNDARY LIMITATIONS OF EACH MODEL, SYSTEMATICALLY SCRUTINIZING DEEP-SEATED RISKS SUCH AS ADMINISTRATIVE DEPENDENCY, CAMPAIGN-STYLE ENFORCEMENT, JURISDICTIONAL OVERREACH, AND REGIONAL DISPARITIES. FINALLY, THE PAPER PROPOSES CONCRETE PATHWAYS FOR TRANSITIONING THE "RIVER (LAKE) CHIEF + PROCURATOR-GENERAL" MECHANISM FROM LOCAL EXPERIMENTATION TO NATIONWIDE INSTITUTIONALIZATION, FROM NORMATIVE DOCUMENTS TO LEGAL AUTHORIZATION, AND FROM EPISODIC PRACTICES TO NORMALIZED PROTOCOLS, THEREBY PROVIDING THEORETICAL SUPPORT FOR DEEPENING THE RIVER AND LAKE CHIEF SYSTEM TOWARD "SUBSTANTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONALITY" DURING THE 15TH FIVE-YEAR PLAN PERIOD (2026–2030).

         

      /

      返回文章
      返回